Latvia vs Montenegro: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Latvia
100.0%
in 2019
Montenegro
100.0%
in 2019
Latvia rank
132nd
Montenegro rank
134th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Latvia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Montenegro, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Montenegro ahead.
Latvia ranks 132nd and Montenegro ranks 134th of 191 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 92.9% | 100.0% | 7.0% | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 99.6% | 100.0% | 0.4% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Latvia or Montenegro?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Montenegro as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Latvia and Montenegro?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Montenegro?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Latvia and Montenegro rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Latvia ranks 132nd and Montenegro ranks 134th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.