Lesotho vs Russian Federation: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Lesotho
100.0%
in 2019
Russian Federation
100.0%
in 2019
Lesotho rank
1st
Russian Federation rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Lesotho
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Lesotho ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.1% | 99.0% | 3.0% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 99.4% | 99.8% | 0.4% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Lesotho or Russian Federation?
- Lesotho, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Russian Federation as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Lesotho and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Russian Federation?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Russian Federation rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Lesotho ranks 1st and Russian Federation ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.