Lesotho vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Lesotho
100.0%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2019
Lesotho rank
1st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Lesotho
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Lesotho ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 96.1% | 100.0% | 3.9% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 99.4% | 100.0% | 0.6% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Lesotho or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Lesotho, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.0%, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lesotho and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Lesotho ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.