Lithuania vs Slovakia: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Lithuania
96.0%
in 2019
Slovakia
96.1%
in 2019
Lithuania rank
176th
Slovakia rank
175th
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Lithuania
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 96.1% against 96.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Slovakia ahead.
Lithuania ranks 176th and Slovakia ranks 175th of 191 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.5% | 90.5% | 3.0% | Slovakia |
| 2010s | 94.7% | 95.3% | 0.6% | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Lithuania or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 96.1% against 96.0% in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Lithuania and Slovakia?
- 0.1%, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Slovakia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Lithuania and Slovakia rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Lithuania ranks 176th and Slovakia ranks 175th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.