Madagascar vs Chinese Taipei: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Madagascar
100.0%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
100.0%
in 2019
Madagascar rank
1st
Chinese Taipei rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Madagascar
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Chinese Taipei has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 1st and Chinese Taipei ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Chinese Taipei has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.2% | 58.8% | 44.7% | Chinese Taipei |
| 2010s | 93.8% | 100.0% | 6.2% | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Madagascar or Chinese Taipei?
- Madagascar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Madagascar and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Chinese Taipei rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Madagascar ranks 1st and Chinese Taipei ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.