Marshall Islands vs Papua New Guinea: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Marshall Islands
100.0%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
100.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Marshall Islands or Papua New Guinea?
- Marshall Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Papua New Guinea rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.