Marshall Islands vs Rwanda: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Marshall Islands
100.0%
in 2019
Rwanda
100.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Rwanda rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Marshall Islands
- Rwanda
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Marshall Islands or Rwanda?
- Marshall Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Rwanda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Marshall Islands and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Rwanda?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Marshall Islands and Rwanda rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Marshall Islands ranks 1st and Rwanda ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.