Mauritius vs Papua New Guinea: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Mauritius
100.0%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
100.0%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Mauritius
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Mauritius or Papua New Guinea?
- Mauritius, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Papua New Guinea rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.