Mauritius vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Mauritius
100.0%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2019
Mauritius rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Mauritius
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Mauritius or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Mauritius, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Mauritius ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.