Micronesia (country) vs New Zealand: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Micronesia (country)
100.0%
in 2019
New Zealand
100.0%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
New Zealand rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Micronesia (country)
- New Zealand
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 100.0% | 5.6% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Micronesia (country) or New Zealand?
- Micronesia (country), at 100.0% against 100.0% in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Micronesia (country) and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and New Zealand?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and New Zealand rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.