Micronesia (country) vs Suriname: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income)
Micronesia (country)
100.0%
in 2019
Suriname
100.0%
in 2019
Micronesia (country) rank
1st
Suriname rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income) over time
- Micronesia (country)
- Suriname
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Suriname ahead.
Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Micronesia (country) averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (country) | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.4% | 99.7% | 5.3% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.9% | 0.1% | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Micronesia (country) or Suriname?
- Micronesia (country), at 100.0% against 100.0% in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Micronesia (country) and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (country) and Suriname?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (country) and Suriname rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 1st and Suriname ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.