Republic of Moldova vs Morocco: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Republic of Moldova
100.0%
in 2019
Morocco
100.0%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
Morocco rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Morocco
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Morocco, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Republic of Moldova averaged higher in 1 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.1% | 65.1% | 30.0% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 99.0% | 99.5% | 0.4% | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Republic of Moldova or Morocco?
- Republic of Moldova, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Morocco as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Republic of Moldova and Morocco?
- 0.0%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Morocco?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Morocco rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Morocco ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.