Republic of Moldova vs Qatar: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Republic of Moldova
100.0%
in 2019
Qatar
100.0%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova rank
1st
Qatar rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Republic of Moldova
- Qatar
How they compare
Republic of Moldova currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Qatar, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Qatar ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Moldova | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.1% | 69.7% | 25.4% | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 99.0% | 89.6% | 9.4% | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Republic of Moldova or Qatar?
- Republic of Moldova, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Qatar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Republic of Moldova and Qatar?
- 0.0%, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Moldova and Qatar?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Republic of Moldova and Qatar rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Republic of Moldova ranks 1st and Qatar ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.