Moldova vs Solomon Islands: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income)
Moldova
100.0%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
100.0%
in 2019
Moldova rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income) over time
- Moldova
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.1% | 100.0% | 4.9% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 99.0% | 100.0% | 1.0% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Moldova or Solomon Islands?
- Moldova, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Moldova and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Solomon Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Moldova and Solomon Islands rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.