Mongolia vs Sierra Leone: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2019
Sierra Leone
100.0%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
1st
Sierra Leone rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Mongolia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Sierra Leone has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.2% | 88.0% | 17.8% | Sierra Leone |
| 2010s | 97.9% | 98.1% | 0.2% | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Mongolia or Sierra Leone?
- Mongolia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Sierra Leone as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Mongolia and Sierra Leone?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Sierra Leone?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Sierra Leone rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.