Mongolia vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Mongolia
100.0%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100.0%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Mongolia
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and United Arab Emirates in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.2% | 57.9% | 12.4% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 97.9% | 100.0% | 2.1% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Mongolia or United Arab Emirates?
- Mongolia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Mongolia and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.