Mozambique vs Uruguay: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Mozambique
100.0%
in 2019
Uruguay
100.0%
in 2019
Mozambique rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Mozambique
- Uruguay
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.6% | 67.5% | 22.0% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Mozambique or Uruguay?
- Mozambique, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Mozambique and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Mozambique and Uruguay rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Mozambique ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.