Myanmar vs United Arab Emirates: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Myanmar
100.0%
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
100.0%
in 2019
Myanmar rank
1st
United Arab Emirates rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Myanmar
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United Arab Emirates has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 57.9% | 57.9% | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 50.0% | 100.0% | 50.0% | United Arab Emirates |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Myanmar or United Arab Emirates?
- Myanmar, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Myanmar and United Arab Emirates?
- 0.0%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and United Arab Emirates?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Myanmar and United Arab Emirates rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Myanmar ranks 1st and United Arab Emirates ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.