Namibia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Namibia
100.0%
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of
100.0%
in 2019
Namibia rank
1st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Namibia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Namibia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Namibia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Namibia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Namibia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Namibia ranks 1st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.