North Macedonia vs Paraguay: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
North Macedonia
100.0%
in 2019
Paraguay
100.0%
in 2019
North Macedonia rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- North Macedonia
- Paraguay
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Paraguay, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.4% | 100.0% | 14.6% | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), North Macedonia or Paraguay?
- North Macedonia, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Paraguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 0.0%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Paraguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do North Macedonia and Paraguay rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- North Macedonia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.