Papua New Guinea vs United Kingdom: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Papua New Guinea
100.0%
in 2019
United Kingdom
100.0%
in 2019
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Papua New Guinea
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Papua New Guinea or United Kingdom?
- Papua New Guinea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Papua New Guinea and United Kingdom rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.