Philippines vs Chinese Taipei: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Philippines
100.0%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
100.0%
in 2019
Philippines rank
1st
Chinese Taipei rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Philippines
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 1st and Chinese Taipei ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.0% | 58.8% | 40.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 100.0% | 0.9% | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Philippines or Chinese Taipei?
- Philippines, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Philippines and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Chinese Taipei?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Philippines and Chinese Taipei rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Philippines ranks 1st and Chinese Taipei ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.