Samoa vs United States of America: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Samoa
100.0%
in 2019
United States of America
100.0%
in 2019
Samoa rank
1st
United States of America rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Samoa
- United States of America
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United States of America, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.
Samoa ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | United States of America | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | United States of America |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Samoa or United States of America?
- Samoa, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United States of America as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Samoa and United States of America?
- 0.0%, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and United States of America?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Samoa and United States of America rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Samoa ranks 1st and United States of America ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.