San Marino vs Saint Lucia: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
San Marino
100.0%
in 2019
Saint Lucia
100.0%
in 2019
San Marino rank
1st
Saint Lucia rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- San Marino
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Saint Lucia has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 94.7% | 100.0% | 5.3% | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 93.7% | 100.0% | 6.3% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), San Marino or Saint Lucia?
- San Marino, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Saint Lucia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 0.0%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Saint Lucia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do San Marino and Saint Lucia rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- San Marino ranks 1st and Saint Lucia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.