Solomon Islands vs United States: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Solomon Islands
100.0%
in 2019
United States
100.0%
in 2019
Solomon Islands rank
1st
United States rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Solomon Islands
- United States
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United States, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Solomon Islands or United States?
- Solomon Islands, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United States as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Solomon Islands and United States?
- 0.0%, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and United States?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Solomon Islands and United States rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and United States ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.