Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Uruguay: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2019
Uruguay
100.0%
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Uruguay
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 67.5% | 32.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Uruguay?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Uruguay rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.