Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Sudan: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
100.0%
in 2019
Sudan
100.0%
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
1st
Sudan rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Sudan
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Sudan, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Sudan?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sudan?
- 0.0%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sudan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Sudan rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 1st and Sudan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.