Chinese Taipei vs Vanuatu: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Chinese Taipei
100.0%
in 2019
Vanuatu
100.0%
in 2019
Chinese Taipei rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Chinese Taipei
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Chinese Taipei ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chinese Taipei | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.8% | 100.0% | 41.2% | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Chinese Taipei or Vanuatu?
- Chinese Taipei, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Vanuatu as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Chinese Taipei and Vanuatu?
- 0.0%, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chinese Taipei and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Chinese Taipei and Vanuatu rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Chinese Taipei ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.