Trinidad and Tobago vs Zambia: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Trinidad and Tobago
100.0%
in 2019
Zambia
100.0%
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago rank
1st
Zambia rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Zambia
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 99.5% | 0.5% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Trinidad and Tobago or Zambia?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Zambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Zambia rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st and Zambia ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.