Ukraine vs United Kingdom: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
Ukraine
100.0%
in 2019
United Kingdom
100.0%
in 2019
Ukraine rank
1st
United Kingdom rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, United Kingdom has been ahead every year.
Ukraine ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ukraine | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.0% | 100.0% | 41.0% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 99.9% | 100.0% | 0.1% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), Ukraine or United Kingdom?
- Ukraine, at 100.0% against 100.0% in United Kingdom as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between Ukraine and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ukraine and United Kingdom?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Ukraine and United Kingdom rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- Ukraine ranks 1st and United Kingdom ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.