United Kingdom vs Uzbekistan: Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita)
United Kingdom
100.0%
in 2019
Uzbekistan
100.0%
in 2019
United Kingdom rank
1st
Uzbekistan rank
1st
Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) over time
- United Kingdom
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
United Kingdom currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Kingdom ahead.
United Kingdom ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Kingdom | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 94.6% | 5.4% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 97.8% | 2.2% | United Kingdom |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita), United Kingdom or Uzbekistan?
- United Kingdom, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita) between United Kingdom and Uzbekistan?
- 0.0%, with United Kingdom ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Kingdom and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do United Kingdom and Uzbekistan rank globally for starting a business: paid-in minimum capital (% of income per capita)?
- United Kingdom ranks 1st and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Paid-in Minimum capital (% of income per capita) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the paid-in minimum capital requirement benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.