Antigua and Barbuda vs Comoros: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
52.94
in 2019
Comoros
52.94
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
149th
Comoros rank
149th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Comoros
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Comoros, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 149th and Comoros ranks 149th of 191 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Comoros | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 47.06 | 5.88 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 52.94 | 51.76 | 1.18 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Comoros?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Comoros as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Comoros rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 149th and Comoros ranks 149th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.