Armenia vs Republic of Korea: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Armenia
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Korea
88.24
in 2019
Armenia rank
8th
Republic of Korea rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Armenia
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Armenia ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.94 | 48.74 | 4.2 | Armenia |
| 2010s | 82.35 | 81.18 | 1.18 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Armenia or Republic of Korea?
- Armenia, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Armenia and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Republic of Korea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Republic of Korea rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Armenia ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.