Australia vs Brunei Darussalam: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Australia
88.24
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam
88.24
in 2019
Australia rank
8th
Brunei Darussalam rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Australia currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.24 | 0 | 88.24 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.24 | 38.24 | 50 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Australia or Brunei Darussalam?
- Australia, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Australia and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Brunei Darussalam?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 8th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.