Australia vs Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Australia
88.24
in 2019
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
88.24
in 2019
Australia rank
8th
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Australia
- Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 8th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.24 | 52.94 | 35.29 | Australia |
| 2010s | 88.24 | 74.71 | 13.53 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Australia or Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- Australia, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Australia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Australia and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Australia ranks 8th and Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.