Azerbaijan vs Republic of Moldova: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Azerbaijan
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
88.24
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
8th
Republic of Moldova rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Moldova in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.18 | 43.7 | 2.52 | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 82.35 | 71.76 | 10.59 | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Azerbaijan or Republic of Moldova?
- Azerbaijan, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Azerbaijan and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Republic of Moldova?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Republic of Moldova rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.