Azerbaijan vs Taiwan, China: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Azerbaijan
88.24
in 2019
Taiwan, China
88.24
in 2019
Azerbaijan rank
8th
Taiwan, China rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Azerbaijan
- Taiwan, China
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Taiwan, China, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Taiwan, China ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 8th and Taiwan, China ranks 8th of 190 countries.
Taiwan, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Taiwan, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.18 | 60.5 | 19.33 | Taiwan, China |
| 2010s | 82.35 | 86.47 | 4.12 | Taiwan, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Azerbaijan or Taiwan, China?
- Azerbaijan, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Taiwan, China as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Azerbaijan and Taiwan, China?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Taiwan, China?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Azerbaijan and Taiwan, China rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Azerbaijan ranks 8th and Taiwan, China ranks 8th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.