Bahamas vs Micronesia (country): Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Bahamas
64.71
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
64.71
in 2019
Bahamas rank
99th
Micronesia (country) rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 99th and Micronesia (country) ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.71 | 64.71 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 63.53 | 64.71 | 1.18 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Bahamas or Micronesia (country)?
- Bahamas, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Bahamas and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Micronesia (country)?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Micronesia (country) rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 99th and Micronesia (country) ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.