Bahamas vs Syrian Arab Republic: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Bahamas
64.71
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
64.71
in 2019
Bahamas rank
99th
Syrian Arab Republic rank
99th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Bahamas
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 64.71 against 64.71 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 99th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 99th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 64.71 | 50.98 | 13.73 | Bahamas |
| 2010s | 63.53 | 64.71 | 1.18 | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Bahamas or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Bahamas, at 64.71 against 64.71 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Bahamas and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Bahamas and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Bahamas ranks 99th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 99th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.