Belarus, Republic of vs Burundi: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Belarus, Republic of
82.35
in 2019
Burundi
82.35
in 2019
Belarus, Republic of rank
28th
Burundi rank
28th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Belarus, Republic of
- Burundi
How they compare
Belarus, Republic of currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Burundi, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Burundi ahead.
Belarus, Republic of ranks 28th and Burundi ranks 28th of 190 countries.
Burundi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus, Republic of | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.05 | 58.82 | 32.77 | Burundi |
| 2010s | 72.94 | 80.59 | 7.65 | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Belarus, Republic of or Burundi?
- Belarus, Republic of, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Burundi as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Belarus, Republic of and Burundi?
- 0, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Burundi?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Belarus, Republic of and Burundi rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Belarus, Republic of ranks 28th and Burundi ranks 28th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.