Belarus vs Lithuania: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Belarus
82.35
in 2019
Lithuania
82.35
in 2019
Belarus rank
27th
Lithuania rank
27th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Belarus
  • Lithuania
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 82.35 against 82.35 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.

Across all 17 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 26.05 62.18 36.13 Lithuania
2010s 72.94 76.47 3.53 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Belarus or Lithuania?
Belarus, at 82.35 against 82.35 in Lithuania as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Belarus and Lithuania?
0, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?
17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Lithuania rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Belarus ranks 27th and Lithuania ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.