Belize vs Botswana: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score

Belize
52.94
in 2019
Botswana
52.94
in 2019
Belize rank
146th
Botswana rank
146th

Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time

  • Belize
  • Botswana
0204060200320112019

How they compare

Belize currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Botswana, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 146th and Botswana ranks 146th of 188 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 52.94 43.53 9.41 Belize
2010s 52.94 52.35 0.5882 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Belize or Botswana?
Belize, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Belize and Botswana?
0, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Botswana?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belize and Botswana rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
Belize ranks 146th and Botswana ranks 146th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.