Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Haiti: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
35.29
in 2019
Haiti
35.29
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
180th
Haiti rank
180th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Haiti
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 35.29 against 35.29 in Haiti, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Haiti has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 180th and Haiti ranks 180th of 191 countries.
Haiti has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Haiti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.53 | 29.41 | 5.88 | Haiti |
| 2010s | 27.06 | 35.29 | 8.24 | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Haiti?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 35.29 against 35.29 in Haiti as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Haiti?
- 0, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Haiti?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Haiti rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 180th and Haiti ranks 180th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.