Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Eritrea: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Bosnia and Herzegovina
29.41
in 2019
Eritrea
29.41
in 2019
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
186th
Eritrea rank
186th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Eritrea
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 29.41 against 29.41 in Eritrea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Eritrea ranks 186th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.39 | 29.41 | 0.9804 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 28.24 | 29.41 | 1.18 | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Eritrea?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 29.41 against 29.41 in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2019.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Eritrea rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 186th and Eritrea ranks 186th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.