Botswana vs El Salvador: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Botswana
52.94
in 2019
El Salvador
52.94
in 2019
Botswana rank
149th
El Salvador rank
149th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Botswana
- El Salvador
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 149th and El Salvador ranks 149th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and El Salvador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.54 | 40.34 | 4.2 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 52.35 | 52.94 | 0.5882 | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Botswana or El Salvador?
- Botswana, at 52.94 against 52.94 in El Salvador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Botswana and El Salvador?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and El Salvador?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and El Salvador rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Botswana ranks 149th and El Salvador ranks 149th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.