Brunei Darussalam vs Republic of Korea: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Korea
88.24
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
8th
Republic of Korea rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 50 | 50 | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 38.24 | 81.18 | 42.94 | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Republic of Korea?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Korea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Korea?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Korea?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Republic of Korea rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th and Republic of Korea ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.