Brunei Darussalam vs Tajikistan: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Brunei Darussalam
88.24
in 2019
Tajikistan
88.24
in 2019
Brunei Darussalam rank
8th
Tajikistan rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th and Tajikistan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 29.41 | 29.41 | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 38.24 | 78.24 | 40 | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Brunei Darussalam or Tajikistan?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Tajikistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Brunei Darussalam and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Tajikistan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Tajikistan rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 8th and Tajikistan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.