Burkina Faso vs Republic of Moldova: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Burkina Faso
88.24
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
88.24
in 2019
Burkina Faso rank
8th
Republic of Moldova rank
8th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Burkina Faso
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.3 | 43.7 | 12.61 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 87.65 | 71.76 | 15.88 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Burkina Faso or Republic of Moldova?
- Burkina Faso, at 88.24 against 88.24 in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Burkina Faso and Republic of Moldova?
- 0, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Republic of Moldova?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Burkina Faso and Republic of Moldova rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Burkina Faso ranks 8th and Republic of Moldova ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.