Cambodia vs Comoros, Union of the: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Cambodia
52.94
in 2019
Comoros, Union of the
52.94
in 2019
Cambodia rank
148th
Comoros, Union of the rank
148th
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Cambodia
- Comoros, Union of the
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 52.94 against 52.94 in Comoros, Union of the, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros, Union of the ahead.
Cambodia ranks 148th and Comoros, Union of the ranks 148th of 190 countries.
Comoros, Union of the has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Comoros, Union of the | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.71 | 47.06 | 2.35 | Comoros, Union of the |
| 2010s | 46.47 | 51.76 | 5.29 | Comoros, Union of the |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Cambodia or Comoros, Union of the?
- Cambodia, at 52.94 against 52.94 in Comoros, Union of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Cambodia and Comoros, Union of the?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Comoros, Union of the?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Comoros, Union of the rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Cambodia ranks 148th and Comoros, Union of the ranks 148th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.