Cameroon vs Marshall Islands: Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score
Cameroon
76.47
in 2019
Marshall Islands
76.47
in 2019
Cameroon rank
51st
Marshall Islands rank
51st
Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 76.47 against 76.47 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 51st and Marshall Islands ranks 51st of 190 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.02 | 74.79 | 32.77 | Marshall Islands |
| 2010s | 71.18 | 76.47 | 5.29 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score, Cameroon or Marshall Islands?
- Cameroon, at 76.47 against 76.47 in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score between Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Marshall Islands?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Marshall Islands rank globally for starting a business: procedures required - men (number) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 51st and Marshall Islands ranks 51st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Procedures required - Men (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of procedures for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.